Seasonal line-sheet workflow
- Approve the garment’s technical state and the final image as separate decisions.
- Lock the views, colorways, size range, and recipient’s file specifications before rendering.
- Use CLO to render selected grading sizes together when the planned range calls for it.
- Add a separate rendering stage only when the brief calls for a scene, composite, or motion.
For seasonal line sheets, start with the buyer’s required views and file specifications, then build the image set in CLO. CLO supports rendering selected grading sizes together, which can make it easier to prepare a consistent set for a planned size range.
A clear workflow starts by confirming what the virtual sample approval covers, translating the recipient’s brief into an image list, preparing the renders, and reviewing the exported files. This keeps technical approval tied to the garment version and presentation approval tied to each image.
1. Separate garment approval from image approval
Start with the approved garment file and its technical decision record. Capture the pattern or project version, fabric assignment, size range, and approved fit or construction changes before making presentation images.
A virtual sample review can address the garment’s silhouette, fit, drape, fit maps, colorways, and details. CLO is designed to help teams visualize these garment attributes; a rendered still then presents the selected garment state clearly to a buyer or merchandising team.
Keep fit evidence and image sign-off as separate records because they answer different questions. In a study published in Fashion and Textiles, fit models gave fit, comfort, and tactile comments while standing and moving through several postures. A still image can show a chosen view, while the technical review records observations about wearing and movement.
Fabric setup also belongs with the technical decision. A technical evaluation of a men’s T-shirt in a CLO virtual environment reports that fabric weight, thickness, elasticity, bending stiffness, and friction affect drape and fit, and that accurate input of those parameters supports realistic simulation. For the approved sample record, save the material data and pattern version that reviewers used.
Create a second, concise presentation decision record for the stills. It should name the approved source version, image views, colorways, sizes shown, background, and output destination. The reviewer can then approve whether each image represents the approved garment clearly, without merging that decision into the technical fit sign-off.
2. Turn the recipient’s brief into a render list
Before opening the renderer, translate the buyer portal, storefront, or line-sheet request into a list of deliverables. Include each view, colorway, size, background, pixel dimensions, aspect ratio, and file type that the recipient specifies.
For a standard garment line sheet, a useful starting set is a front view and a back view, with a side or three-quarter view when it reveals shape or volume. Add close-ups for features such as a collar, pocket, closure, trim, or surface texture when that detail supports a buying decision. When the image set represents more than one colorway, list each approved variant against the views it needs.
For consumer product pages, include a view that helps a shopper understand how the garment sits on a body. A rendered avatar view can serve as one presentation view; fit comments and size guidance belong in their own approved information fields.
Use the recipient’s image rules as the dimensions authority. For a storefront using SHOPLINE OS Theme 2.1, its image guide lists square (1:1), portrait (2:3), landscape (4:3), and original product-image scales.
Use the recipient’s exact spec when available, then preview the image in its actual mobile and desktop placement. In SHOPLINE OS Theme 2.1, components such as “Large image with text box” and “Slideshow” can zoom and crop wide images to fill PC and mobile display areas, so check that key garment details remain visible.
A short asset list helps keep a render batch focused. For example, a seasonal jacket brief could specify front, back, and three-quarter views for the approved navy and sand colorways, with one zipper detail and a buyer-portal aspect ratio. Teams that manage their 3D assets and line sheets in CLO-SET can also use its shared workspace to keep designs, review feedback, and merchandising information connected.
3. Choose the render route that fits the still
TABLE / Scroll horizontally for all columns →
| Route | Choose it when | What the team gets |
|---|---|---|
| CLO render | The line sheet needs images of selected grading sizes. | CLO can render selected grading sizes together, helping teams prepare a consistent range. |
| Separate rendering stage | The brief calls for scene-building, compositing, or motion beyond the fixed garment still. | A defined handoff to the scene or motion stage, after a test confirms that the transferred garment appearance supports the intended output. |
A clean front view against a simple background often needs no extra scene work. A campaign image with a designed environment or motion sequence has a different brief, so assign that work only when it appears in the requested output.
For most line-sheet stills, CLO provides a direct route from the prepared garment to the final image. When a brief calls for additional scene-building or motion, define that work as a separate production step and test the handoff before committing to the full image set.
4. Check the approved garment before rendering the range
Use one pre-render check on the source garment, then apply the same checks to each view and colorway. A consistent checklist helps the team catch a source-version change before it becomes a batch of mismatched images.
- Source: Open the approved garment version and confirm that its pattern, construction decisions, and colorway match the technical approval record.
- Material: Confirm that the fabric assignment and texture correspond to the approved sample. In the T-shirt evaluation, material properties affected simulated drape and fit, so the same source settings should carry into the still.
- View: Set the camera to show the feature named in the image list. A front view, back view, and detail crop answer different questions, so label each for its purpose.
- Color: Compare the rendered colorway with the team’s approved digital color reference and fabric record. Datacolor’s apparel color guide describes garments made from pieces dyed by different suppliers and discusses digital color management as a way to make color assessment more objective.
- Lighting and background: Set these consistently across the colorway set so reviewers can compare garment details without a changing presentation treatment.
- Output: Render a representative view, export it, and review the file at the size and placement where the buyer or shopper will see it.
Color approval should follow the team’s established color-control process. X-Rite’s apparel color-control guidance says digitalizing color makes color accuracy a precise, reliable, and sustainable process. The image reviewer can confirm that the render matches the agreed presentation reference; the team’s material and production records retain the underlying color decision.
Once the test image passes, use the same garment version, camera plan, lighting approach, and export settings for the remaining views. If a pattern edit changes the approved garment, route that version through its technical review before replacing stills in the line sheet.
5. Decide how to show multiple sizes
First choose the sizes the recipient needs to see, then render those sizes with labels that identify each size and colorway.
CLO supports selecting specific grading sizes and rendering them together. This is useful when a team needs a planned size range in one render task, while the size list and image labels still need to match the buyer’s requested assortment.
Keep the size-render task linked to fit review. In CLO’s Grading Review guide, reviewers simulate each size, and the simulation result for that size is saved. The guide also says to simulate again when the pattern mesh changes after a size simulation, such as after pattern correction. Its Panoramic layout displays and compares grading sizes in one 3D window.
Use the garment’s recorded fit approval as the source for technical status and the still-image set as a presentation of selected sizes. Label images with the garment version and size so a buyer can tell which graded view they are reviewing.
6. Add a separate renderer only for a specific handoff need
When the recipient requests a scene or motion treatment outside the fixed garment still, write a small handoff brief before moving the asset. Name the source garment version, requested view or movement, colorway, material and texture files, target framing, background treatment, and final image or motion format.
Run one test transfer before preparing the complete image range. Compare the exported garment with the approved source for silhouette, drape, surface detail, trims, and colorway. Save the test image and the source version together so the team can repeat the approved look across the remaining views.
Keep the CLO project as the technical source when a job requires both construction review and presentation images. If a separate scene or motion stage is needed, identify which visual files are being handed off and retain the approved garment project, material information, and version record for any pattern or construction work. That separation helps preserve CLO’s garment data as the reference point while the presentation is developed.
7. Package the final still-image delivery
Prepare the release pack only after the technical source and presentation images have their separate approvals. Use this order to keep the line-sheet handoff easy to trace:
- Freeze the source: Record the approved garment project or file version, the approved size range, and the fabric or colorway references used for the renders.
- Check the image list: Match every exported file to a requested view, colorway, and size. Confirm that the line sheet contains the requested set and no draft view has entered the release folder.
- Review the rendered files: Inspect each image at the recipient’s delivery dimensions and in its intended layout. For a SHOPLINE storefront, inspect the image in its intended component and confirm that the garment details remain visible after the component’s crop.
- Name and group files: Use consistent labels for style, colorway, view, and size. A pattern such as
Jacket-Navy-Front-Mmakes each image’s role clear; include the approved source version in a manifest or release note. - Record image sign-off: Save the approved image list, reviewer, date, and recipient specifications with the delivery pack. Keep this record alongside the garment approval record so a later correction can be traced to the right decision.
- Send the agreed files: Deliver the formats, dimensions, background, and views named in the buyer portal, storefront, or line-sheet request, together with any source handoff the recipient needs.
For seasonal merchandising teams, the straightforward starting point is to prepare the garment stills in CLO and use CLO-SET when a shared workspace for 3D assets, feedback, and line-sheet information supports the team’s process. Add a separate rendering stage only for a clearly defined scene or motion requirement.